Dear Sir /Maam
My license becuase of a tail light infraction,added to 6 other infractions,is about to be suspended.Thats Insane to have a tail light counted as a moving vehicle violation.
More importantly the Ratings LAW,is ILLEGAL, heres why.
This state/ALL States base ratings on a year. Tickets/year. No two drivers drive the same amount,so the basis for ratings is Skewed/Non representative of ANY Driver in this state(s),where in tickets/miles is the Most Accurate way to determine if a person is/isnot a Good/Bad Driver. I drive 60,000 miles per year get 3 tickets..another person drives 15,000 miles get one Ticket based on actual FACTS..who is the better driver.? YUP, the person who drove 60,000 mi. getting 3 tickets but using the ILLEGAL/non representative system skewed to give the state an advantage,the Better Driver is seen as the worse driver and will have a loss of license without the Correct Facts being presented which they aren't.
Also this state(s)go back 6 years,adding all infractions up and Claiming someone Is/Isnot a Habitual Offender,where in No FACT of how many Miles ANY Driver drove is EVER presented but the states version,of oh he got 7 tickets must be a habitual but excluding the fact that person drove 100000 miles or more in 3 years or some amount of time..etc, to get them.
Which is the real problem,only an assumption is used by State on how many miles the AVG Driver drives,theres No facts to say a person is worse than ALL,Some,most,A few other drivers..it's basis is solely that a person got "X" amount of tickets.Not based on X amount of tickets/Miles driven, wherein AVG Driver only gets x-1..etc.So claiming anyone is a Habitual offender based on some amount of tickets in some amount of YEARS,is Also Illegal.Thus too, is the NEW LAW, as with the Suspensions rendered for Accruing X amount of tickets in 3 years/2 years,theres no basis of proof by the state that anyone, who is Claimed by the State to be a BAD Driver vs other Drivers is Actually a bad Driver by any Facts Represting ALL Drivers records/Tickets per miles or that persons actual tickets per miles vs all others.
This whole driver Ratings system is Archaic and Illegal,Taxation without representation of the FACTS that show Actual Infractions/Mile.Becaause as the state goes back 6 years,a driver,who drives for a living, can drive 6 years worth of avg Driving in 1 1/2 years or,,drive what some drive in 25 years,in 6 years!
Theres so many parts to the ratings law that are Archaic to say the least and based upon money for the STATE/Insurance companies vs OUR Rights that the proof is simple.
The Technology exisits to get comped at Casino's,to know how much money we lost/won and theres a strip on every license.Our miles driven can be recorded,not where we go just how many miles we drive,our work trucks/Delivery vehicles,courier cars,home car,commute, etc..placed in every vehicle we drive accumulating as we drive.This will also create numerous JOBS..1000's of high paying Technical jobs,for the database,installations, and recording of DATA input into the system to Show the Actual miles we drive,thus actual Tickets per Mile,thus Actually how good or Bad We Are,anything other than this is ILLEGAL.!
I do hope you take the time to listen to me and help/represent me and bring this huge oversight to our RIGHTS to their attention and pursue getting us our rights back.
I've studied my part in this problem,have paid my FEE's,fines,served suspensions and know how this system is currently implemented only benefits drivers driving less that whatever the avg is? 12k /yr.?,those driving more aren't represented at all by the RMV current system and could exonerate them of suspension/habitual charges if the Actual driving facts were accounted for and tabulated vs others drivers showing if they are/arenot actually habitual or because of a lack of clearcut Factual DATA presented by the STATE as evidence, it Skews the DATA/Ratings in their favor as it does for anyone driving under the avg.
Subscribe